The statement addresses the nature of a debate between two Presidents, focusing on whether it should be about policy records and future vision or past accusations. The tone is neutral and aims to guide the debate towards constructive topics that benefit the public.
- The statement strives to do no harm by encouraging a focus on policy and future vision rather than past accusations, which can be divisive. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting that a debate on policy and future vision is beneficial for America. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement encourages constructive dialogue by advocating for a focus on substantive issues rather than personal attacks or past accusations. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to guide public discourse towards topics that can benefit society, such as policy and future vision. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by suggesting a responsible use of the debate platform to discuss meaningful issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.