Gary Marcus

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -68
6/26/2024, 7:17:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Thomas G. Dietterich
@tdietterich
·
128d
@GaryMarcus @a16z @pmarca @martin_casado Is there a good summary of the arguments pro- and con- for this bill? Links?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
128d
Incredible. The discussion on California’s SB-1047 - the most substantive protections for AI safety under serious consideration in the U.S. - has become an exercise in throwing insults. Casado @a16z blocked me just now for pointing this out.

VCs like @pmarca and @martin_casado…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
128d
I have seen at least six messages like this from Casado, never with any specifics, just insults.

What are your exact concerns, Martin?

The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public issue, specifically the discussion around California’s SB-1047 bill related to AI safety. The tone is one of frustration and a call for more informed and respectful dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by calling for serious and informed discussions rather than insults and misrepresentation. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It points out the lack of serious discussion without attacking individuals personally. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by expressing a desire for informed discussions about the bill's drawbacks and benefits. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting the need for serious, informed discussions and not engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]