In reply to:
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
127d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
127d
The statement by @slow_developer constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues such as disinformation, cybersecurity, and the future of AI, contributing to a broader civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about disinformation, which is a harmful issue. It aligns with the principle by highlighting a potential harm to democracy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out critical issues, but it does so in a somewhat alarmist tone, which might not foster empathy or compassion effectively.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question and providing a thoughtful list of concerns. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing significant public issues with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.