Marianne Williamson

The statement 'Nor was it legal.' in the context of a conversation about the NTSB's conclusion regarding the chemical burn-off in the Ohio Norfolk Southern train derailment does constitute public discourse. It engages with a public issue related to safety, legality, and corporate responsibility.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies wrongdoing which could be harmful if not substantiated. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the legality of the action. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to highlight a potentially significant issue, which could be for the betterment of society if it leads to accountability. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern responsibly. [+1]