Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -14
In reply to:
Ryan Hickman
@ryanmhickman
·
125d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
125d

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the legal and ethical implications of AI-generated content, specifically focusing on copyright issues and the standards for transformative or derivative works. The tone is critical and analytical, aiming to highlight the complexities and potential legal troubles faced by platforms like Midjourney.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on a legal and ethical issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by discussing the complexities of copyright law in the context of AI-generated content. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, addressing disagreements without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant societal issue, thereby contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]