Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement involves a summary of a public figure's responses to questions after a debate, touching on performance, calls for dropping out, and health. The tone is straightforward, but the content includes a personal attack on an opponent by calling them a liar.
- The statement partially violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by including a personal attack on an opponent. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent but includes a derogatory remark about an opponent, which can be seen as a form of verbal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, especially with the inclusion of the term 'liar.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead includes a personal attack, which is not conducive to constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.