The statement critiques two Presidents for their lack of foresight regarding future challenges. It implies a failure in leadership and vision, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions, but it does criticize past leaders.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight a perceived lack of foresight in leadership, which can be seen as an attempt to encourage better future governance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to critique leadership. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.