Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement addresses a recent decision in a legal case (Loper) and discusses its implications for the administrative state, government bureaucrats, Congress, and the courts. The tone is assertive and supportive of the decision, indicating a stance on the balance of power between different branches of government.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned opinion on a legal matter. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the roles of Congress and the courts in interpreting laws, which can foster informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the roles of institutions rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant legal and public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.