Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 55
Reposted by Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
367d
That’s right: no AGI without symbols. And pure symbolic AI isn’t enough, any more than pure LLMs are.

We need neurosymbolic AI.

(And even that won’t on its own be enough; necessary, but not sufficient.)
6/28/2024, 5:41:33 PM
X

The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about approaches to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), a significant topic in the field of artificial intelligence. The conversation involves expert opinions and debates on the necessary methodologies and technologies to advance AGI, which is a matter of public and academic interest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the conversation do not cause harm. They are focused on a technical discussion about AGI approaches, which is a constructive and informative topic. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexity of achieving AGI and the need for multiple approaches. It respects the contributions of various experts in the field. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing and building upon the opinions of other experts. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]