Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 8
6/28/2024, 7:26:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Kwesi Afful
@DigitalKway
·
122d
@GaryMarcus If neurosymbolic isn’t enough, what else?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
122d
That’s right: no AGI without symbols. And pure symbolic AI isn’t enough, any more than pure LLMs are.

We need neurosymbolic AI.

(And even that won’t on its own be enough; necessary, but not sufficient.)
David Asabina
@vidbina
·
122d
@fchollet @arcprize 🎓 Outside of the challenge, here is what respected leaders in AI are looking at for AGI:

@GaryMarcus: neurosymbolic AI
@bengoertzel: @opencog Hyperon
@ylecun: JEPAs

and @ilyasut is back with @SSI to build superintelligence (not general intelligence) as the goal 🎯

The statement and the linked content engage in a substantive discussion about the future of artificial intelligence (AI) and the approaches needed to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The conversation involves multiple experts in the field, discussing various methodologies and challenges associated with AGI. The tone is professional and focused on sharing knowledge and insights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the linked content strive to do no harm. They focus on sharing information and insights about AI research without any harmful intent. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing diverse expert opinions and encouraging a deeper understanding of the challenges and approaches in AI research. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to questions and providing additional resources for further reading. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to contribute positively to the discourse on AI, aiming to inform and educate the audience about important developments and challenges in the field. [+2]