Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a critical commentary on a recent Supreme Court decision, suggesting that the court's actions undermine public health and safety. The tone is accusatory and alarmist, aiming to provoke concern and possibly outrage among the audience.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear or anger, potentially causing harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the Supreme Court justices by implying malicious intent. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on inciting a negative reaction. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks against the Supreme Court justices. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a public issue, but it does so in a divisive manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its alarmist tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.