In reply to:
Kathleen
@KathleenAkyla50
·
374d
Schyler Parker ☘️
@Schyler__Parker
·
374d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
374d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about political leadership and the qualifications necessary to lead the country. The tone is assertive and aims to counter a criticism regarding her experience, while also addressing broader societal issues such as emotional detachment from public pain.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a defense of the speaker's qualifications and does not include harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by explaining the speaker's perspective on emotional connection to public pain. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism directly without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a political discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.