Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 9

The statement and the subsequent conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue: the Supreme Court's decision to overrule the Chevron doctrine and its implications for federal agency authority. The tone is urgent and informative, aiming to raise awareness among scientists and the general public about the potential impact of this legal decision.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation strive to do no harm by informing the public about a critical issue that could affect many aspects of life, such as environmental regulations and public health. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the implications of a legal decision rather than engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging scientists and those interested in science to read and understand the implications of the Supreme Court's decision. It fosters empathy and compassion by highlighting the broad societal impact. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive dialogue by providing links to detailed articles and encouraging informed discussion rather than personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by raising awareness about a significant legal change that could affect public policy and daily life. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The conversation upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform and engage the public on a critical issue with integrity. [+2]