Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 26

The statement critiques the perceived disconnect between societal values and the rewards given to those who may contribute to potentially catastrophic technologies. It references a conversation about the risks and timelines associated with Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and questions the ethics and motivations of those involved in its development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone but raises a critical issue about the potential harm of AGI, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the ethical concerns surrounding AGI development. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the motivations and ethics of those developing AGI, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to raise awareness about the potential societal risks of AGI, aiming for the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]