The statement and the linked content constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the performance of President Biden in a presidential debate, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the linked content criticizes President Biden's performance harshly, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and linked content do not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the harsh criticism could be seen as lacking respect for dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and linked content do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; they are critical without offering constructive feedback. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and linked content do not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but they do not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication in the statement or linked content about acknowledging or correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement and linked content use influence to critique a public figure, which can be seen as contributing to public discourse, but not necessarily for the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement and linked content uphold free speech principles but could be more responsible and constructive in their critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.