Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement from the Philadelphia Enquirer Editorial Board constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the participation of Donald Trump in the presidential race. The tone is critical and the intent is to argue that Trump should withdraw from the race for the betterment of the country.
- The statement does not appear to use harmful language directly, but it is critical of Trump, which could be seen as harmful by his supporters. However, it does not engage in overtly harmful rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critical opinion piece but maintains a level of respect. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and a perspective that the author believes is in the best interest of the country, though it may not foster empathy or compassion towards Trump or his supporters.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a form of criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the idea that Trump should withdraw for the country's benefit. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion, which the authors believe is for the betterment of society by suggesting a course of action they think is beneficial. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express an editorial opinion with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.