In reply to:
Boaz Nash
@boazhsan
·
118d
The statement and the linked content engage in a substantive discussion about the future of AI, particularly the limitations of scaling and the need for new techniques such as metacognition. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses significant issues in the field of artificial intelligence, which has broad societal implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional critique of current AI trends. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a professional opinion on AI development, which can foster informed discussions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the 'scale is all you need' notion in AI, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important issues in AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.