Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue: the role of the Supreme Court in regulating corporate activities and the broader implications for governance and public welfare. The tone is critical and urgent, aiming to provoke thought and action regarding judicial appointments and corporate influence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone with words or actions. It critiques institutional decisions rather than individuals, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on institutional critique rather than personal attacks, thus not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the impact of judicial decisions on public welfare, though it could be more constructive in tone. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the Supreme Court's decisions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to constructive dialogue principles. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for judicial appointments that prioritize public welfare over corporate interests. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss significant public issues with integrity. [+2]