Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the current approach to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and suggests that spending a large sum of money on it is wasteful. It aligns with Gary Marcus's viewpoint and calls for a reconsideration of the strategy towards metacognition.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a critique of a public issue, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the current approach and suggesting an alternative focus on metacognition, which can be seen as an attempt to foster a more effective and efficient path forward. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current AGI approach without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, thus adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the efficiency of a significant financial investment in AGI, the statement uses its influence to advocate for a potentially more beneficial approach for society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.