In reply to:
Brennan Erbz
@BrennanErbz
·
118d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
118d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about AI models and their training data, which can be considered part of public discourse as it addresses a topic of public interest in the field of artificial intelligence and technology.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual and technical response. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to clarify a technical point, which can promote understanding among those interested in the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a technical clarification without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a technical discussion with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.