Andrew Yang

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 133

The statement suggests that Joe Biden should step aside for the good of the country, drawing a parallel to George Washington. The hashtag #swapJoeout indicates a call to action for a change in leadership. The tone is critical and implies that Biden's continued leadership is not in the country's best interest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that Biden's leadership is harmful, which could be seen as a critique rather than a personal attack.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge Biden's dignity by suggesting he should step aside. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or specific reasons for the criticism, and the hashtag could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a change in leadership, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, depending on one's perspective. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though the integrity of the argument could be questioned due to the lack of constructive dialogue. [+1]