Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses a critical view of a Supreme Court decision that grants immunity to a former President for actions taken as part of official duties. The tone is sarcastic and disillusioned, suggesting a belief that this decision undermines the rule of law in the United States.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing disillusionment. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but criticizes the decision and its implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about a significant legal and political issue, aiming to inform the public. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a critical opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.