Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement by Gov. Josh Shapiro constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue—the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. The tone is serious and concerned, reflecting a critical stance on the ruling and its implications for the nation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses a concern about the ruling without using inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by expressing concerns about the future of the nation, though it could be more constructive in suggesting solutions or alternatives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the decision itself rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.