In reply to:
Christian Watson
@OfficialCWATSON
·
107d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
107d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of a Supreme Court decision on the principle of checks and balances in the U.S. government. It critiques the decision by arguing that removing the criminal justice system as a check on executive power eliminates a crucial filter for abuse, thus contributing to a broader discussion on governance and accountability.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the implications of a legal decision rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by explaining the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue at hand and not resorting to ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant societal issue, thereby contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- It upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive discussion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.