In reply to:
Nina Turner
@ninaturner
·
107d
Voting for an Economic Bill of Rights🌍🧜🏾♀️🐉💫
@OGPlaneteer
·
107d
Nina Turner
@ninaturner
·
107d
Elie Mystal
@ElieNYC
·
107d
The statement engages in a discussion about voting strategies and their implications, which is a substantive engagement with public issues. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify a point about the impact of voting choices.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is focused on providing information and analysis. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the consequences of voting choices. It does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion, but it does aim to inform. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point about voting strategies. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a civic dialogue about voting. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.