Gary Marcus

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 43

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities and limitations of generative AI, specifically in the context of simulating physical phenomena. It addresses a public issue related to the development and understanding of AI technologies, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a technical critique and does not contain any harmful language or intent. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining a technical aspect of AI, specifically the artifact of doing inference in pixel space. This helps others understand the limitations of current AI models. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific technical point without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a respectful tone. [+2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a technical discussion in a meaningful way. [+1]