In reply to:
Brunna Tom
@bruna_tom
路
114d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
114d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the development and limitations of AI technology, specifically in the context of game engines and realistic simulations. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about AI capabilities and future directions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a technical critique rather than a personal attack.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting that a new approach is needed for AI development, although it could be more empathetic in its delivery.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the technical issues and suggesting a need for a new approach. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue related to AI technology.聽[+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.