In reply to:
Nissan Yaron
@nisyron
路
114d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
114d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and limitations of generative AI technologies, which is a significant public issue in the realm of technology and ethics.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of technology rather than individuals.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a critical discussion about technology.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of generative AI technologies and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue.聽[+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.