Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
איתמר בן גביר
@itamarbengvir
·
389d
The statement and image provided constitute public discourse as they address significant public issues related to national security, human rights, and the treatment of prisoners. The tone of the statement is assertive and unapologetic, with a clear intent to justify harsh measures against prisoners labeled as terrorists. The content includes admissions of poor prison conditions and a proposal for the death penalty as a solution to overcrowding.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. The endorsement of worsening prison conditions and the proposal of the death penalty can be seen as harmful and inhumane. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly the prisoners, by referring to them in dehumanizing terms and advocating for their harsh treatment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it promotes punitive measures and harsh treatment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a unilateral declaration of intent without consideration of opposing views or the potential for dialogue. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for policies that could be seen as detrimental to human rights, which does not align with using influence for the betterment of society. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.