Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving a former president and a Supreme Court decision, which are matters of public concern.
- The statement is factual and does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It reports on a legal development without inflammatory language. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by focusing on the legal proceedings rather than personal attacks or derogatory remarks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and factual, which can promote understanding by providing information about a significant legal and political event. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It reports on the situation without bias or hostility. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information about a public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.