The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the performance of President Biden in a presidential debate and the suggestion that he should step aside as the Democratic nominee.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but the language used ('dismal and depressing performance') could be seen as harsh criticism. This could be considered a minor violation of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a public figure's performance in a public role, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical and does not offer a constructive path forward, which is a minor violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the performance rather than personal attributes, which aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.