Gary Marcus

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 60
7/3/2024, 3:21:03 PM
X
In reply to:
Benjamin Riley
@benjaminjriley
·
113d
@GaryMarcus Would 100% read a long-form essay explaining your belief about #1
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
113d
Two questions that are sometimes conflated:
1. Will AGI ever be achieved,
2.Will be achieved simply by scaling current techniques.

The answer to the first question is almost certainly YES; the answer to the second is almost certainly NO.

[Fun history lesson below is a…
Dariusz Kot
@realDariuszKot
·
113d
old chess machine unable to play more than 2 moves

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the development and potential of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the feasibility and methods of achieving AGI, referencing historical and contemporary examples of AI capabilities and limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the preceding conversation do not appear to cause harm. They are part of a constructive dialogue about AGI, a topic of significant public interest. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging a deeper exploration of the topic. The participants are sharing resources and thoughts to foster a more informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive and respectful. The participants are engaging in a meaningful exchange of ideas without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]