The statement addresses a public issue by discussing a strategy to dismantle the administrative state through legal means, specifically referencing the 'Major Questions Doctrine' and a recent Supreme Court case. The tone is assertive and prescriptive, aiming to influence public policy and administrative practices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the aggressive language ('ruthlessly apply') could be seen as promoting a confrontational approach. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a legal and administrative strategy. Neutral.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on a legal strategy rather than individuals. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to propose a significant change in public policy, which the author believes is for the betterment of society. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a legal and policy issue responsibly. Adheres well. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.