In reply to:
Neverfall News & Media
@NeverfallNM
·
100d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
985d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the incarceration of Leonard Peltier and the call for his pardon. The tone is assertive and empathetic, aiming to address a perceived injustice and urging action from the President.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the release of someone believed to be wrongfully convicted, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on a public figure and a public issue without engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the health and human rights concerns of Leonard Peltier. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a query about her stance on pardoning Peltier, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the speaker to advocate for what she believes is the betterment of society, specifically addressing a human rights issue. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.