Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 228
7/4/2024, 11:35:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
The elite define “qualified” as someone qualified to perpetuate the system as it is. But in order to meet this moment, including defeating Donald Trump, the main qualification should be someone who is dedicated to the effectuation of systems of radical compassion.
In other…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
That’s why when it comes to who is best to replace President Biden should he step down, the answer should be “It’s the agenda, stupid.”
5/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
Both major parties are filled with people so emotionally buffered from the suffering of their fellow citizens they think such cynical thoughts as “Well, those people don’t vote anyway.”
But why would they? They will vote when they feel they have something to vote FOR.
4/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
The problem with our political elite is that they fail to recognize the despair - particularly economic despair - that pervades whole swaths of American society. One party sees it and preys on it. The other hardly see it at all.
3/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
Donald Trump offers false hope to people, but for many false hope is better than no hope at all. The key to defeating Trump in November is to offer real hope to people who in today’s America feel none.
2/7
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
99d
The question for those who don’t wish to see Trump be president again should not just be Who can beat him, but What can beat him?
1/7

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the political landscape and the strategies to defeat Donald Trump. The tone is critical of the status quo and suggests a need for change within the Democratic Party to effectively challenge Trump. The intent is to advocate for a shift away from traditional politics towards more radical and compassionate systems.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its critical tone towards 'status quo Democrats' could be seen as divisive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques political strategies and figures without personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the need for 'radical compassion' and addressing the despair felt by many Americans. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Democratic Party's current strategies without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for political strategies that offer real hope and address economic despair. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss political strategies and advocate for change. [+2]