Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement critiques the American political system, suggesting that the two dominant parties collude to limit competition. It also promotes a podcast episode that explores this issue and features a former presidential candidate advocating for change. The tone is critical and aims to inform and provoke thought about the political landscape.
- The statement does not use harmful language and aims to inform rather than attack, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By promoting a discussion on political reform, the statement encourages understanding and empathy towards the need for change in the political system. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for societal betterment by highlighting the need for political reform. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using its platform to discuss public issues with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.