Gary Marcus

Rank 24 of 47
|
Score 60
7/7/2024, 12:29:29 AM
X
In reply to:
Angela Gallerizzo
@AMG0323
·
108d
@GaryMarcus I think from what I read is that AI is currently 'unable' to tell the truth based off the data it has been trained on...and that is just a lawsuit waiting to happen...
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
108d
The truth can no longer be denied: Generative AI is a turning out to be dud — exactly like I have been saying, for nearly a year.
Jacob Silverman
@SilvermanJacob
·
110d
From a recent Goldman Sachs report on generative AI: limited $$ upside, capital intensive, can't solve complex problems, no killer app. The bull case is that they somehow figure it all out or simply that "bubbles take a long time to burst." [PDF]
https://web.archive.org/web/2024…

The statement engages in public discourse by contributing to a discussion on the capabilities and limitations of AI technology. The tone is assertive, and the intent is to emphasize the speaker's prior warnings about AI's limitations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a part of a broader discussion on AI technology, which is a significant public issue. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by sharing a perspective on AI's limitations, which can contribute to a more informed public dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to another user's comment and adding to the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]