Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving international law, war crimes, and the actions of political parties in the UK. It questions the stance of the new Labour government on a matter of international justice and human rights, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language ('shamelessly defend Israeli war crimes') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the Labour government by implying they might 'shamelessly' defend war crimes. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a loaded question that implies guilt and does not foster a productive discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to an important issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society, but the confrontational tone may undermine this effort. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant issue, but the tone and language could be more responsible and measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.