Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement 'Reform is in the air.' along with the linked article about the effort to require open primaries in Arizona constitutes public discourse. The statement and the linked content engage with a substantive public issue, namely electoral reform, which is a significant topic in civic dialogue.
- The statement and linked article do not contain harmful language or actions. They focus on a positive change in the electoral process. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and linked article promote understanding and empathy by highlighting efforts to make the primary elections more equitable. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and linked article do not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. They focus on the issue of electoral reform. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a societal issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for a more equitable electoral process. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about an important civic issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.