Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement by Shelane Etchison constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to the performance of elected leaders in Washington and is part of a political campaign. The tone is critical but aims to engage voters on the topic of political representation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of elected leaders but does not use harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting a perceived lack of adequate representation, which could foster a sense of shared concern among voters. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of elected leaders without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the candidate's influence to advocate for better representation, which can be seen as an effort for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.