Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement from Karl in Exeter, NH, constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the capability of President Biden to serve another term. The tone is concerned and professional, and the intent appears to be to share a personal and professional opinion on a matter of public interest.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm; it is a professional opinion based on the author's experience. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the dignity of President Biden by focusing on his capabilities rather than personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by sharing a professional perspective, but it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. It partially adheres to this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is a form of constructive criticism and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing a professional opinion. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.