In reply to:
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
@AndrewYang
·
554d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the conduct of elected officials and the political process surrounding Joe Biden's candidacy. The tone is critical and supportive of Dean Phillips while expressing disappointment in other officials.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but implies criticism of other officials, which could be seen as harmful to their reputations. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others while expressing a critical opinion. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective but does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political process and officials but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for higher standards of patriotism and principle among elected officials, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to express a political opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.