In reply to:
Panta
@thepanta82
·
106d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the implications of legislative exemptions for the AI industry in the context of corporate accountability, comparing it to the Boeing case. The tone is factual and aims to clarify the specifics of SB-1047, highlighting the industry's push for exemptions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual information about the legislative exemption and industry response. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing specific details about the exemption and the industry's reaction. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation and providing relevant information. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about legislative and industry actions, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.