Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 22

The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the nature of #Project2025 and its impact on political fundraising and public perception. The tone is somewhat informal and critical, aiming to expose what the author perceives as a manipulative tactic by both major political parties.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its critical tone could potentially polarize opinions. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally. It critiques the actions of political parties and corporations, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the author's platform to raise awareness about what they perceive as a manipulative tactic, which can be seen as an attempt to better inform society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public issue without resorting to misinformation or personal attacks. [+1]