Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the control of California's water supply and the rights of farm workers, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived injustices by a wealthy family against farm workers.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory. It partially adheres to this principle but could be more measured in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious allegations against a specific family, which could be seen as a violation of their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for farm workers, aligning well with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather makes accusatory claims, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a societal issue, which aligns with using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be more responsible and balanced in its presentation of facts and allegations.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.