Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement 'That’s not what a ceasefire is.' in response to a news article about the Israel-Gaza war and Netanyahu's comments on a ceasefire deal constitutes public discourse. The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the definition and implications of a ceasefire in the context of an ongoing conflict.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a factual correction or clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a neutral correction. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying what a ceasefire is, which can foster better-informed discussions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the definition of a ceasefire rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the public understanding of a ceasefire. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.