In reply to:
The statement reflects an observation about voter behavior and engagement with a political debate. It provides insight into how some voters, despite being highly informed and engaged, may not have watched the debate live but have still kept up with it through clips on TV or social media. The tone is neutral and informative, aiming to share an interesting finding rather than to persuade or criticize.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. It simply shares an observation without any negative connotations or harmful implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing insight into voter behavior, which can foster empathy and a better grasp of how people engage with political content. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is focused on sharing information and does not criticize or attack any individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing relevant information in a neutral and informative manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.