Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 239
7/9/2024, 3:01:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Matt Bruenig
@MattBruenig
·
89d
@atrupar One interesting democratic-theory type question is what to make of a primary election outcome where the winning candidate opted not to reveal key information relevant to voters, which affected both the vote and the level of competition in the primary.
Aaron Rupar
@atrupar
·
90d
Stewart ignores that:

1. There was a whole ass Democratic primary election
2. Kamala Harris is the VP and the only Biden alternative that makes sense
3. A thunderdome convention would do anything but “unify” the party

I’m glad he had a chance to vent though
The Daily Show
@TheDailyShow
·
90d
Is it too late for Dems to change course? Jon Stewart reacts to Joe Biden's defiance over calls to step aside

The statement 'And suppressed other candidates. It was a vital part of the strategy' is part of a broader conversation about the Democratic primary election and the strategies employed by candidates. This discussion touches on public issues related to democratic processes, election transparency, and political strategy, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies a critique of the election process, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the actions within the political strategy rather than attacking individuals personally.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critiquing the strategy used in the primary election.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the election strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public issue responsibly. [+1]