Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a public issue, specifically the debate over Senate Bill 1047, which concerns the regulation of artificial intelligence in California. The tone of the statement is critical but also seeks to engage in constructive dialogue by inviting proposals for improvement. The intent appears to be to correct what the author perceives as misinformation and to encourage a more informed and collaborative discussion on the bill.
- The statement aims to correct misinformation, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by ensuring accurate information is disseminated. However, the use of the term 'inaccurate, inflammatory statements' could be seen as somewhat confrontational. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by addressing organizations rather than individuals and by acknowledging their contributions to the tech ecosystem. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by appreciating the engagement of the firms and inviting their input on how the bill might be improved. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific concerns and inviting dialogue, rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to encourage a more informed and collaborative discussion on a public policy issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.