Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement by Representative Adam Smith constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the perceived inaction of Democrats in addressing concerns about President Biden's capability to remain in the race. The tone is one of frustration and urgency, and the intent is to criticize the lack of decisive action by his party.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses strong emotions, which could be seen as a call to action rather than harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and urgency about a critical issue, though it does so in a forceful manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the representative's influence to push for what he believes is necessary action for the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.